GemNews

All stories · Article

Find the step where shoppers leave before shipping another fix

Until a store knows which step shoppers abandon, every new improvement is a guess.

By Iris (Nghi Chau) · · 6 min read

Share: WhatsApp · Telegram · X · Facebook · LinkedIn · Email

One seller on r/ecommerce says the site has only gotten better over five years, yet conversion rate peaked at around 0.14% in 2023 and has slid since.

The list behind that frustration is long and reasonable. Bigger menus with more subcategories. Better filtering. A new homepage and imagery. Shipping costs and lead times that are easier to find. Q&A added to the most popular product pages. A developer pass on speed. An absurd amount of time on SEO, in the seller's own words. None of it was aimed at a step the seller had measured.

More traffic makes the same leak more expensive

When shoppers already reach the site and leave without adding to cart, more visitors don't touch the problem. They pay for it again.

u/FirstLightStudios described the usual reflex in a thread on r/ecommerce: sales slow down, and the store answers with more Meta spend, more Google, more creators, more SEO. Their argument is blunt. If people already land on the site and barely add to cart or buy, extra traffic just makes the same problem cost more.

A page that loses most visitors at one step will lose most of the new visitors at that same step. The ad bill grows. The leak does not shrink.

Split the path to purchase into four steps before changing anything

The fix should follow the drop, and the drop only shows up once the path is split. Four steps cover most stores: a shopper lands, views a product, adds to cart, and completes checkout. Count the shoppers at each step over the same period, then look at what share makes it to the next one. The handoff with the steepest fall is where the next fix belongs.

This also answers the question u/FirstLightStudios put to other sellers: which number should send a store back to its own site? They listed conversion rate, add-to-cart rate and checkout completion. The split uses all three. Conversion rate is what is left after every handoff, so on its own it says that shoppers leave, not where.

The author of a post titled "10 things I’d check if a Shopify store gets traffic but barely converts" sets the same order of work. Check the store experience before spending more on acquisition, the author advises. A low conversion rate can come from a lot of places, so the first job is narrowing down where people actually drop off.

Each handoff sends a store somewhere different. A fall after landing points at the match between the ad and the page. A fall after the product view points at the product page. A fall after the cart points at checkout. Three different leaks, three different pages, often three different people on the team.

One apparel brand's drop-off narrowed the fix to the product page

Knowing the step turns a vague problem into a short list. estrah.com, an apparel brand selling heavyweight oversized organic-cotton tees for $29.99 with US shipping included, asked r/ecommerce whether its problem was the product, the positioning or the product page.

Its own data on where shoppers went had already done half the work. Shoppers from Meta ads clicked through and viewed the product, then the overwhelming majority left before adding to cart. A few made it to the cart or checkout, which led the brand to rule out checkout as the main issue.

That rules out a lot of busywork. Checkout tweaks and abandoned-cart flows only act on shoppers who reach the cart, and here almost nobody did. The work belongs on the page where shoppers stopped.

So the brand rebuilt its product page around a clearer product and value proposition, a stronger size selection and a stronger Add to Cart. It had just finished the rebuild when it posted, which makes it a bet placed on the right step rather than a proven fix.

On the product page, shoppers need reasons, not specs

When the leak sits between product view and cart, the first thing the "10 things" author checks is whether the page explains the product clearly. Good photos matter. Video does more when shoppers need to understand size, texture, movement or how the product works.

The copy has a job too: it should help someone make a decision. The author's example is a power bank. "20,000mAh battery" tells a shopper the capacity. "Enough power for several phone charges over a weekend trip" gives them a reason to care.

Both lines describe the same product. Only the second one answers the question a shopper has while deciding whether to tap Add to Cart.

That makes the product page check concrete. Read each block of copy and ask whether it states a spec or a use. Look at each photo and ask whether a shopper could judge size and texture from it. Where they can't, a video showing the product in use is the stronger answer.

Put the ad and the landing page side by side

A fall right after the first click can mean the ad and the page are making different promises. Neither team sees it when each one reads only its own numbers.

Alex Momeni (@alex_momeni), who works on ecommerce CRO, sums up the pattern as good clicks, a working website, and still not enough orders. The ad team checks traffic. The web team checks the page. Momeni's answer is to put both in one conversation built on three questions: "what did the ad promise, what did the shopper see, and where did they stop?"

The third question is the four-step split again. The first two cover what the shopper expected on arrival and whether the page delivered it.

If your store has already shipped a long list of fixes, this is a week of work that costs nothing:

  • Pick one recent period and use it for every count.
  • Write down how many shoppers landed, viewed a product, added to cart and completed checkout.
  • Circle the handoff with the steepest fall.
  • Open your top ad next to the page it sends people to, and answer the three questions in writing.
  • Change only what sits at that step, then count the same four numbers again.

Sources

Discuss on GemCommunity